翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Robinswood Road Metrolink station
・ Robinsón Pitalúa
・ Robinvale
・ Robinvale (disambiguation)
・ Robinvale Airport
・ Robinvale Irrigation District Section B
・ Robinvale Irrigation District Section C
・ Robinvale Irrigation District Section D
・ Robinvale Irrigation District Section E
・ Robinvale railway line
・ Robinvale railway station
・ Robinvale Sport Field
・ Robinvale, New Jersey
・ Robinwood
・ Robinson v. California
Robinson v. Florida
・ Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.
・ Robinson's Arch
・ Robinson's Disengaging Gear
・ Robinson's Ferry
・ Robinson's Ferry, California
・ Robinson's Hole
・ Robinson's joint consistency theorem
・ Robinson's Landing
・ Robinson's mouse opossum
・ Robinson's Requiem
・ Robinson's Warehouse, Bristol
・ Robinson's web-footed salamander
・ Robinson, California
・ Robinson, Illinois


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Robinson v. Florida : ウィキペディア英語版
Robinson v. Florida

''Robinson v. Florida'', 378 U.S. 153 (1964),〔
〕 was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States reversed the convictions of several white and African American persons who were refused service at a restaurant based upon a prior Court decision, holding that a Florida regulation requiring a restaurant that employed or served persons of both races to have separate lavatory rooms resulted in the state becoming entangled in racial discriminatory activity in violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
==Background==
Eighteen white and African American persons went to a restaurant in Shell's Department Store in Miami, Florida. Consistent with the restaurant's policy of refusing service to blacks, the restaurant manager requested the persons to leave. When they refused, they were arrested for violation of a statute allowing a restaurant to have a right to remove any person that it considered detrimental to serve. At trial the defendants their arrest, prosecution, and conviction by the state for requesting service at a restaurant that refused service to African Americans would violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The trial court stayed the adjudication of guilt and, consistent with state law, placed them on probation. On appeal, the Supreme Court of Florida affirmed, holding that the statute under which the convictions were made was nondiscriminatory and thus did not violate equal protection.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Robinson v. Florida」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.